Definition: The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) is the Australian Government’s primary federal agency responsible for environmental protection, climate change policy, energy policy, and water resources management. In the context of major project approvals, DCCEEW plays a critical role in administering the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) — Australia’s key piece of federal environmental legislation.
What Does DCCEEW Do?
DCCEEW’s responsibilities span a broad range of policy and regulatory functions, including:
- Environmental assessment and approvals — administering the EPBC Act to assess and approve actions that may have a significant impact on matters of national environmental significance (MNES)
- Climate change policy — developing and implementing Australia’s emissions reduction targets, carbon markets, and climate adaptation strategies
- Energy policy — coordinating federal energy policy including the transition to clean energy, energy security, and the National Electricity Market
- Water policy — overseeing the Murray-Darling Basin Plan and national water resource management
- Biodiversity conservation — managing threatened species listings, national parks, and international environmental conventions
- Antarctic and ocean policy — managing Australia’s Antarctic territory and marine environment
For energy infrastructure developers, DCCEEW is most commonly encountered through its role in administering the EPBC Act approvals process.
DCCEEW and the EPBC Act
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) is the cornerstone of Australia’s federal environmental law. DCCEEW administers this Act, which requires that any action likely to have a significant impact on a matter of national environmental significance (MNES) must be referred to the Australian Government for assessment and approval.
Matters of national environmental significance include:
- Threatened species and ecological communities — listed under the EPBC Act
- Migratory species — protected under international agreements
- Ramsar wetlands — wetlands of international importance
- World Heritage properties — such as the Great Barrier Reef
- National Heritage places
- Commonwealth marine areas
- Nuclear actions
- Water resources — in relation to coal seam gas and large coal mining developments
If a proposed project is likely to significantly impact any of these values, the proponent must refer the project to DCCEEW, which then determines whether the project is a controlled action requiring federal assessment and approval.
The EPBC Referral and Assessment Process
The DCCEEW-administered EPBC process runs parallel to — but separately from — Queensland’s state-level coordinated project process managed by the Coordinator-General. The two processes do not merge, meaning proponents of major energy projects may need to satisfy both a state EIS process and a federal EPBC assessment simultaneously.
The key steps in the federal process are:
- Referral — the proponent submits a referral to DCCEEW describing the proposed action and its likely impacts on MNES
- Decision on referral — DCCEEW decides whether the action is a controlled action (requiring assessment), a controlled action with a particular assessment approach, or not a controlled action
- Assessment — if a controlled action, DCCEEW determines the most appropriate assessment method, which may include accredited assessment (using the state EIS process), a public environment report, an environmental impact statement, or a public inquiry
- Approval decision — the federal Minister (advised by DCCEEW) decides whether to approve the controlled action, with or without conditions, or refuse it
- Conditions of approval — binding requirements imposed on the proponent to protect MNES throughout construction and operation
Accredited Assessment — Where State and Federal Processes Align
One of the most important mechanisms for streamlining major project approvals in Australia is bilateral accreditation — where the Commonwealth accredits a state’s assessment process (such as Queensland’s EIS process) to satisfy the requirements of the EPBC Act. This means a single EIS can serve both the state and federal assessment requirements, avoiding duplication.
However, even where assessment is accredited, the federal Minister retains an independent approval decision — meaning a project can be approved by the Coordinator-General at the state level but still require a separate federal approval from the Minister administering the EPBC Act.
DCCEEW’s Name History
It is worth noting that DCCEEW has undergone several name changes over the years as its responsibilities have been reorganised across different governments:
- Department of the Environment (various iterations)
- Department of the Environment and Energy
- Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE)
- Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) — the current name as of 2022
When reviewing older project approval documents — such as those for CopperString 2032 — references to the “Department of the Environment” or “Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment” refer to what is now DCCEEW.
Real-World Example: CopperString 2032
DCCEEW (then operating as the Department of the Environment) played a significant parallel role in the CopperString 2032 approvals process:
- May 2019 — The federal delegate determined that the CopperString Transmission Line Project (EPBC 2019/8416) was a controlled action, meaning federal assessment and approval was required due to likely impacts on matters of national environmental significance
- November 2022 — The federal Minister’s delegate granted approval of the controlled action subject to conditions — approximately two months after the Coordinator-General’s evaluation report was released at the state level
This two-month gap between state and federal approvals is a common feature of major Australian infrastructure projects and underscores the importance of running both processes concurrently to avoid unnecessary delays.
Why DCCEEW Matters for Energy Projects
As Australia accelerates its energy transition, DCCEEW is increasingly central to the approvals landscape for new energy infrastructure. Transmission lines, wind farms, solar farms, battery storage facilities, and hydrogen projects all have the potential to interact with matters of national environmental significance — particularly threatened species and ecological communities.
Key reasons why energy developers need to understand and engage with DCCEEW include:
- Federal approval is non-negotiable — if a project is a controlled action, it cannot proceed without federal approval, regardless of state-level approvals
- Conditions can be substantial — federal approval conditions under the EPBC Act can include requirements for offsets, monitoring, management plans, and reporting that persist for the life of the project
- Timelines can be long — federal assessment processes can add months or years to an approvals timeline if not managed proactively
- Referral timing matters — early referral to DCCEEW, ideally concurrent with the state EIS process, is essential to avoiding sequential approval delays
Key Takeaway
DCCEEW is Australia’s federal environmental and energy regulator, and its role in administering the EPBC Act makes it an unavoidable part of the approvals landscape for any major energy project with potential impacts on nationally significant environmental values. For developers, planners, and communities engaged in energy infrastructure projects, understanding how DCCEEW’s processes interact with state-level assessment frameworks is essential to navigating Australia’s complex dual-track approvals system effectively.
Published on energyplanning.com.au | Energy Planning Glossary
// RESOURCES & REFERENCES
📋 Legal
▸ Terms of Use// OUR PARTNERS & NETWORK
// SUPPORT OUR MISSION
✨ Help us continue building tools that simplify complexity!
Every contribution fuels new features and improvements.
Thank you for being part of our journey! 🚀
// CONTACT US